Dan McLaughlin

There are not many usable precedents for what J. D. Vance can do with a one-term vice presidency.

Democrats made a lot of bad choices that drove voters away. That’s how ordinary Americans ended up bringing back Donald Trump.

Voting for Trump is morally intolerable. So is doing nothing to stop Harris. Either way, I violate my conscience.

An effort to discredit Justice Gorsuch is overhyped and misleading.

A competitive race in a racially gerrymandered district could decide the House majority.

The Democrats’ Senate candidate against Ted Cruz has never really done much besides be a partisan.

It’s bad law, bad policy, and bad politics to sue Virginia to protect noncitizens from being removed from the voter rolls.

Pro-lifers need to do more than beat themselves up and accept their opponents’ premises.

David French’s defense of Kamala Harris’s plan to replace conservative Supreme Court justices can’t conceal what it’s about.

Three of the conservative justices might side with the ATF in a case that shouldn’t be close.

Transgenderism, guns, age limits online, and more are on this year’s Supreme Court docket.

The reality of women dying from the abortion pill shows how Democrats are complicit in their deaths.

Kamala Harris and ProPublica are lying to you about why Amber Nicole Thurman died.

The latest leaks show the Court’s vulnerability to insiders using the press to wage war on it as an institution.

When the judiciary makes rules of procedure, it shouldn’t endorse partisan attacks on the courts.

Lower your expectations and be clear-eyed about what a second Trump term would mean.

Walz’s reelection in 2022 against a weak opponent showed that he lost the rural and small-town voters who used to see him as one of them.

Under Tim Walz, Minnesota went from a pro-choice state to a radically pro-abortion state at the expense of pregnant women.

From FDR to Kamala Harris, modern VP picks have changed our history a lot, and many of them were bad ideas.

The Biden-Harris Supreme Court plan attacks the most fundamental basis of the American system.

We should not write off the menace of a Kamala Harris presidency simply because she has proven herself shallow and inept as a vice president.

Sometimes, doing the right thing turns out to be the wrong move.

The failed, sprawling Georgia indictment of Trump could have been very different in competent hands.

A new book brings to life the war in the South.

The Court was right that some presidential acts can’t be criminalized. But it pushed that principle too far, and its application not far enough.

The Court was right to be skeptical of the parties trying to shift their litigating positions on the fly but could have given clarity to federal law.

The Court struck another blow for the right to a jury and exposed the intellectual bankruptcy of the liberal dissenters.

By allowing the executive branch to use diffuse pressure to regulate speech in ways that Congress could not by law, the Court expands the imperial power of the president to stifle dissent.

The Court’s decision in Erlinger v. United States sends an unambiguous message against watering down the rights of the accused.

The Court’s decision in U.S. v. Rahimi empowers the government to limit the gun rights of violent people, but dodges questions about due process of law.