Dan McLaughlin

We should not lightly disregard this as simply harmless academic scribbling.

On this day, a Civil War battle forever changed the nature of the navy.

Monday was a bad day in court for universities and other serial violators of the First Amendment.

A beloved American author is targeted by the book-banners, epitomizing all that’s wrong with cancel culture.

‘Common-good originalism’ would be neither common nor good — and, as a practical strategy, is suicidal.

R.I.P. to a vital voice, a monumental talent, and a comfort to millions for decades.

Her account of the election being rigged against Trump by an invisible cabal of activists is needlessly provocative and unsupported.

The great French chronicler of democracy learned a painful lesson on what happens when principled men try to serve an unprincipled master.

When is mistrust the highest? When people feel that the rules of the game have been changed on them.

The better path would be to simply change the law.

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is not the constitutional shortcut around impeachment and conviction that Democrats would like it to be.

The wisdom of impeaching Trump after he has left office may be debatable, but the better originalist reading of the Constitution is that Congress has the power.

Analyzing the three constitutional processes for removing a president against his will.

Congressional Republicans are engaging in sheer political theater to flaunt their loyalty to Trump, and they know it.

Trying to use Congress as the last stage to override the election is an illegitimate power grab — and a pointless one.

All that remains is a host of extremely longshot court challenges. This was always the likely outcome.

Conservatives have more constructive places to channel their anger.

An inside look into how a high-turnout election actually proved good news for Texas Republicans.

Harassing attorneys is both a frontal assault on longstanding ideals of the legal profession and a nasty tactic of intimidation.

It should not be an unreasonably high standard to ask people not to engage in sex acts while talking to their work colleagues.

A reply to critics.

How many times will people have to fall for this before they learn?

What Norman Ornstein actually seeks is to kill the filibuster without admitting to killing it.

To the extent the suit’s complaints have any validity, only the most boring might apply.

The reality is that nobody in either party has any intention of ever enforcing the Hatch Act against senior people on their own side.

Kobach is the poster boy for doing his homework badly and defeating his own cause.

Whitehouse’s conspiratorial bent runs deep.

From new ideas to eternal truths, we uphold the vital principles that make our nation unique.

This is shallow opportunism.

The liberal-progressive view sounds, at first glance, sensible enough, but there are three problems with this framework.