Noah Rothman

He has reason to be optimistic.

Partisan Democrats may have forgotten all the baggage Ocasio-Cortez carries into 2028. Perhaps they could use a refresher.

Leave it to the New York Times opinion page to argue that the U.S. president should just accept defeat.

Vast quantities of ink have been expended in the effort to address Americans’ anxiety about them. None of it seems to matter.

The Michigan Senate candidate and his defenders are wrong to imply that his views and statements are uncontroversial among his fellow Muslims.

The DPRK is further entrenching itself in Russia’s war, and its commitments are significant.

The Iranians, emboldened as they are, don’t seem willing to take yes for an answer.

Republicans’ odds are long, but with the outcome of last night’s Democratic primary, they have a shot at saving this race — and much more.

The activists will only keep trying.

In such agreements, it is often the case that ‘phase 2’ never comes.

The unconstitutionality of their policy preferences doesn’t seem to bother them much.

The celebrity doctor has learned the hard way that he was only a tool in his political allies’ hands.

The geostrategic benefits remain as murky as the terms of the agreement itself.

The threat Havana poses is not a quaint artifact of a bygone era. It is a real and present danger.

The accounts of Marco Rubio and even Democrat Adam Smith should be convincing enough about the severity of the threat.

It’s certainly not manifesting in measurable consequences for the politicians who support the projects.

The president should spare the country another protracted humiliation in Iran and rip the Band-Aid off now.

Socialists have determined that the secretary of state may be the foremost threat to their project.

It would be hard to argue with a straight face that Tehran’s position is particularly advantageous.

With the Platner disaster, it’s the Democratic Party’s turn to confront how easily it was manipulated by ideologues.

Actually, immigrants to America don’t hate the United States.

Her endorsement of Abdul El-Sayed is a risky gamble, to say the least.

It would be recognized as such if its policy preferences were right of center.

A ‘peace’ unworthy of the word.

The conflict’s ambiguous end is likely to encourage miscalculations.

The nation’s foundation is built upon the bedrock of the right to property and respect for individual labor and its rewards.

The details are not clear, but some observers see shades of the JCPOA in the emerging contours of a deal.

Democrats spent decades scaremongering on entitlement reform.

No, ‘growth’ is not a ‘doomed strategy.

Iran is.